Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1180-988760180-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 01 May 2001 16:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22563 invoked by uid 510); 1 May 2001 22:43:55 -0000 Received: from ej.egroups.com (64.211.240.230) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 1 May 2001 22:43:55 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1180-988760180-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.55] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 01 May 2001 23:36:21 -0000 X-Sender: tony_mht@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 1 May 2001 23:36:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 92880 invoked from network); 1 May 2001 19:17:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 May 2001 19:17:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.15.57) by mta2 with SMTP; 1 May 2001 19:17:17 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:35:52 -0700 Received: from 63.215.236.216 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:35:52 GMT X-Originating-IP: [63.215.236.216] To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <F57PzGNsokLQ8aZRhQd00003e78@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2001 20:35:52.0751 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBD81BF0:01C0D0EB] From: "mo haitao" <tony_mht@hotmail.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 16:35:52 -0400 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] News from China Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This is a report from Chinese website www.sina.com.cn http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/w/65453.shtml Title:Us independent critics say that Chinese hackers are just counterattacking US hackers. News on ET April 28. When some US officers are censuring the pricking up attacking on US websites by Chinese hackers, some independent critics point out that the activities of Chinese hackers are ˇ§revenge ˇ¨. They do these only because Chinese website being attacked by US hackers at first. Report from New York Times: Michael Hick, the general manager of iDefense, an internet information publish cooperation, said on April 28 that in 307 attacking against each otherˇ¦s government websites, 302 were made by US hackers. These hackers had defaced many Chinese homepages and post their supporting slogan to those 24 scout crews. CEO of iDefense, James Adams and a member from Federal Security Consultative Committee also express at the same time that although Chinese hackers had attacked some US governmental websites, undoubtedly, they were revenging for the attacks by US hackers Barret McMick, a Chinese expert and political professor, said that the aero-collision made some Chinese hackers very disgruntled with US government. They hoped to express their dissatisfaction by attacking US websites. All these specialists indicated that at present it is impossible to control such attacking activities for the incomplete regulation of Internet. Adams said: ˇ§ Including Internet attack, Internet criminal activities are very difficult to control, because they are not so obviously as theft or murder. These electronic attacks have not noise and are hard to supervise.ˇ¨ Tony April 29,2001 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:10 PDT