Return-Path: <JStClair@vredenburg.com> Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Received: from 22.214.171.124 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 04 May 2001 06:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6143 invoked by uid 510); 4 May 2001 12:40:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vre?sd?nt.vredenburg.com) (126.96.36.199) by 188.8.131.52 with SMTP; 4 May 2001 12:40:16 -0000 Received: by vre-sd-nt.vredenburg.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <KHA3G697>; Fri, 4 May 2001 06:38:02 -0700 Message-ID: <B30A25E2D1D2D1118021006097C3AC63C97F50@ccopo.vredenburg.com> From: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair@vredenburg.com> To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: [iwar] interesting piece (fwd) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 06:37:14 -0700 Return-Receipt-To: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair@vredenburg.com> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" You wrote: Should I have added a ? top the end of my subject line? I defer to you Sir. ;) Realizing this list consists of all backgrounds with all perpectives it makes prob any and all things worth throwing out. As a beltway guy I am here to tell you (as an INFOSEC pro) this guy is a charlatan, and his company's success supports this theory. Also he wears his NSA title as badge of honor, yet this time his writing actually compromises classified information. I have already sent a note about this to a friend of mine that works there, so we'll see where this goes, if anywhere. Hope New Haven is as nice as D.C. is today.. Jim St.Clair Critical Infrastructure Protection Vredenburg (703) 412-4611 -----Original Message----- From: Fred Cohen [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:28 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: [iwar] interesting piece (fwd) Per the message sent by St. Clair, James: [FC - off list] > This piece is far from interesting. It is rehashed "old news" from an author > that exploits his drinking buddy contacts while compromising alleged open > investigations to reinforce his "look at me!" personality. It's not worth > the paper in the gin-soaked cocktail napkin he wrote it on. > > No criticism intended to Fred for running it or Tony for commenting - just > my 2 cents. This is one of the things I really like about the list. You get peoples' views without anything harsh or abusive. I do not feel criticized at all by it - keep up the commentary. Should I have added a ? top the end of my subject line? -- Fred Cohen at Sandia National Laboratories at tel:925-294-2087 fax:925-294-1225 Fred Cohen & Associates: http://all.net - email@example.com - tel/fax:925-454-0171 Fred Cohen - Practitioner in Residence - The University of New Haven This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve. PGP keys: https://all.net/pgpkeys.html - Have a great day!!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:11 PDT