RE: [iwar] news

From: St. Clair, James (
Date: 2001-06-05 05:22:46

Return-Path: <>
Received: from by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 05 Jun 2001 05:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16652 invoked by uid 510); 5 Jun 2001 11:23:23 -0000
Received: from ( by with SMTP; 5 Jun 2001 11:23:23 -0000
Received: by RESTONPO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <K6W7MQ5G>; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:22:38 -0400
Message-ID: <B30A25E2D1D2D1118021006097C3AC63C9804D@CCOPO>
From: "St. Clair, James" <>
To: "''" <>
Subject: RE: [iwar] news
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:22:46 -0400 
Return-Receipt-To: "St. Clair, James" <>
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

- Fred wrote:
"...  so I am not what you would
call an objective observer..."

Fair enough Fred, but neither are they. As you mentioned, they are part of
C-M Univ, yet their commercialization IMHO opinion concerns me. They cost an
"arm and a leg", which makes me wonder how objective they can be, vice a
CERIAS or NPS where information is the by-product of earnest academic
research, not funding Univ. coffers..

Call me wimpy - This is private as  I chose not to share - I don't know if
you have any CMU folks on the list...


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:15 PDT