[iwar] [fc:Face-scan.outfit.rushes.to.exploit.WTC.atrocity]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-27 15:30:36


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2453-1001629754-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31944 invoked by uid 510); 27 Sep 2001 22:30:53 -0000
Received: from n15.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.65) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 22:30:53 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2453-1001629754-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.220] by ml.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2001 22:30:37 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 22:29:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 92714 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 22:29:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 22:29:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 22:30:37 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id PAA22232 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:30:36 -0700
Message-Id: <200109272230.PAA22232@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Face-scan.outfit.rushes.to.exploit.WTC.atrocity]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Face-scan outfit rushes to exploit WTC atrocity

By Thomas C Greene in Washington

Posted: 26/09/2001 at 09:07 GMT

We've heard of price gouging by retailers of American flags, 'Infinite
Justice' mouse pads, and Bin Laden bin liners; but face recognition
outfit Visionics takes the prize for bottom-feeding on America's
bereavement, fear and anger. 

The company that brings us the FaceIt crowd scanning package says it's
ready for the patriotic mission of "Protecting Civilization from the
Faces of Terror," if only the nation's airports would invest untold
millions in its Orwellian product. 

"In an effort to address heightened security concerns in the wake of the
September 11 terrorist attacks on America, Visionics
Corporation...announced today a comprehensive framework for the use of
facial recognition technology in enhancing airport security," a company
press release chirps. 

The company would very much like the nation's airports (and ultimately
passengers) to enrich its shareholders by setting up cameras throughout
their facilities to scan crowds for frequent-flier terrorists, and by
requiring "an instantaneous terrorist background check on each passenger
upon check-in and boarding by searching facial images against
intelligence databases of terrorists and their affiliates."

No data is provided indicating the relative likelihood that a terrorist
well-enough known to have a head shot on file would actually be passing
through a US airport.  Since most members of the terror hit parade use
obscure underlings to do their dirty work, we'd need to see some
evidence that this scheme could produce anything more than a false sense
of security. 

Indeed, the more airport staff rely on technological wizardry, the less
likely they are to apply proven security techniques like careful
observation, challenging interviews, and gut instincts.  Indeed, the
chief criticism of US airport security today is the fact that it uses
staff willing to work for McBurger wages -- meaning that our safety is
in the hands of uneducated, uncommitted, unprofessional warm bodies just
passing through and unlikely to be around for more than a year.  No one
with an ounce of self respect, after all, aspires to stare at X-ray
images of luggage for eight hours a shift. 

But Visionics will hear none of this. 

"Paramount to building this protective shield...is delivering a scalable
platform which can tie into an unlimited number of cameras and into a
wide network of intelligence databases.  Our Biometric Network Platform
does exactly that.  It incorporates our leading FaceIt technology, and,
by adhering to industry standards for responsible use, can be deployed
without posing a threat to our privacy," Visionics CEO 'doctor' Joseph
Atick gushed. 

We're concerned by the phrase 'industry standards for responsible use.'
Truth be told, we'd just as soon not rely on an industry that profits
from the manufacture and sale of the basic tools of mass oppression to
devise 'standards' for our protection without legal oversight. 

The danger of face recognition technology is not so much how it might be
used today, but how, one day in the future, it could be exploited to
search for just about any sort of unfashionable person. 

We simply don't know what sort of government we'll have in 20 - 50 - 70
years' time.  If today we should permit these tools to catalogue our
faces because we trust the government we have at the moment, our
descendants may well curse us if a Fascist regime ever comes to power. 

It's a mistake to put the basic tools of mass oppression into the hands
of any government simply because we have, at the moment, laws protecting
us from its abuse. 

Laws change; governments rise and fall.  If we should hold fast now, a
repressive future regime would have a hard time making a sudden power
play for this sort of technology.  However, if, thanks to our current
state of doubt and insecurity, we allow it to become an everyday
feature, we may not even notice its abuse until it's too late to stop
without mass civil commotion. 

We owe our children and grandchildren better.  We owe them the right to
be free men and women, to accept the risks of living in an essentially
and eternally dangerous world, to come and go as they please without
justifying themselves to underpaid nitwits and without submitting to a
biometric scan to enter a restaurant, attend the cinema, watch a ball
game, or meet friends at the airport. 

We owe them their essential humanity. 

A Visionics 'white paper' heroically called "Protecting Civilization
from the Faces of Terror: A Primer on the Role Facial Recognition
Technology Can Play in Improving Airport Security" is to be posted here. 
It was not available at press time, but is promised soon.  ®

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:51 PDT