[iwar] [fc:House.Bill.Would.Expand.Internet.Surveillance.Powers]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-02 19:55:09


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2624-1002077711-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 02 Oct 2001 19:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28093 invoked by uid 510); 3 Oct 2001 02:55:18 -0000
Received: from n29.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.79) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2001 02:55:18 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2624-1002077711-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.56] by n29.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2001 02:55:11 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 3 Oct 2001 02:55:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 10652 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2001 02:55:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Oct 2001 02:55:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2001 02:55:10 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id TAA10271 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:55:09 -0700
Message-Id: <200110030255.TAA10271@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:House.Bill.Would.Expand.Internet.Surveillance.Powers]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

House Bill Would Expand Internet Surveillance Powers

By Dana Milbank,
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 2, 2001; 8:00 AM

House negotiators yesterday agreed to give the government new authority
to investigate and detain terrorist suspects, a bipartisan compromise
that denied the Bush administration some powers it sought but that was
assailed by civil libertarians as a blow to American values. 

Under an agreement reached by Judiciary Committee Chairman F.  James
Sensenbrenner Jr.  (R-Wis.) and the ranking Democrat, Rep.  John Conyers
Jr.  (Mich.), authorities would be able to hold any foreigner suspected
of terrorist activity without charges for as long as a week.  The
anti-terrorism legislation would also expand the government's
wiretapping and Internet surveillance powers in terrorism cases. 

The 122-page House legislation, dubbed the "Patriot Act," is due to be
considered by the committee Wednesday and by the entire House next week. 

The House compromise will become a framework for negotiations with the
Senate and the administration over an expansion of police powers
following the Sept.  11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon.  David Carle, spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee
Chairman Patrick J.  Leahy (D-Vt.), said the Senate and House bills
"will largely complement each other."

He said Senate Democrats and Republicans "negotiated through the weekend
and are close to an agreement over here."

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said, "The administration has
been working very closely with members of the House, as well as with
Chairman Leahy and others in the Senate who have just jurisdiction over
this."

The Bush administration sought new anti-terrorism legislation in the
aftermath of the attacks, saying it was necessary because of what
Attorney General John D.  Ashcroft described as the "clear and present
danger" of further terrorist attacks. 

The agreement yesterday came as more than 100 members of Congress
traveled to New York to view the devastation at the World Trade Center. 

In the thorniest matter faced by negotiators, the government would be
allowed to detain any foreigners suspected of terrorist activity for up
to seven days without filing charges or giving them an opportunity to
ask a judge to release them.  That would apply both to legal immigrants
and those in the country illegally. 

After that time, the government would either need to file criminal
charges, begin deportation proceedings or release the suspects. 
Attorney General John D.  Ashcroft had sought detention powers without
any particular time limit. 

Even after the seven days, Ashcroft would have power to detain
foreigners until they are deported as long as he has "reasonable grounds
to believe" that they may be involved in terrorism. 

Ashcroft had sought broader language, allowing detention if there was
"reason to believe" the person was involved in terrorism.  Only the
attorney general or the Immigration and Naturalization Service
commissioner would certify such detentions, which could be reviewed by
courts. 

Jeanne Butterfield, executive director of the American Immigration
Lawyers Association, called the compromise "a significant improvement"
over Ashcroft's request. 

But Laura W.  Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's
Washington office, said the compromise was "inadequate" and "confers
unprecedented detention authority on the attorney general."

The House compromise would also give the government multiple wiretap
powers in terrorism cases so that surveillance would be attached to an
individual rather than a particular telephone. 

It would also make it easier for law enforcement officials to obtain
wiretaps.  Under existing law, wiretaps can be obtained under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act if the primary purpose for getting
the information is intelligence, rather than criminal enforcement. 
Ashcroft had sought to use the FISA provision if intelligence gathering
was merely "a purpose." The proposed House legislation would compromise
with "a significant purpose."

The wiretap provision would expire in December 2003; renewing it would
require congressional approval. 

Law enforcement officials would be able to get court orders allowing
them to retrieve records of e-mails and other electronic communications,
not just telephone records. 

Such orders would not entitle investigators to review the content of
e-mails and telephone calls, however, and electronic evidence obtained
illegally would be unusable. 

The legislation also grants Ashcroft's wish to remove the statute of
limitations from a number of terrorism offenses, while increasing
maximum penalties for terrorism-related crimes and expanding offenses to
include support or expert advice to terrorists. 

Those gathering intelligence information would now be allowed to share
their information with criminal investigators. 

The proposed legislation would drop provisions Ashcroft had sought that
would allow certain intelligence information gathered overseas to be
admitted in U.S.  courts even if the methods used to obtain the
information would cause the evidence to be thrown out of court if it had
been gathered domestically. 

Also removed were Ashcroft provisions that would have allowed
authorities to search a suspect's home without notification that they
had searched, and provisions allowing the release of student records to
authorities. 

The committee, while honoring many of the requests Ashcroft made,
modified some of those provisions. 

The lawmakers backed a list of crimes that Ashcroft wanted characterized
as terrorism but added language that such crimes must be "calculated to
influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or
coercion or to retaliate against government conduct."

Prosecutors would also have more ability to share grand jury information
with other government officials investigating terrorism, but they would
need court approval to do so. 

Ashcroft would also have expanded ability to obtain business records of
suspects, but he would not have the power he sought to do so without
going to court first. 

To protect civil liberties, the House legislation would create a new
inspector general's office in the Justice Department for civil rights
and civil liberties; it would be responsible for handling complaints and
reporting to Congress. 

The proposal would also increase, to $10,000 from $1,000, the damages
private citizens could seek from the government for civil liberties
violations. 

Staff writer John Lancaster contributed to this report. 

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:53 PST