Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3062-1003368473-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20746 invoked by uid 510); 18 Oct 2001 01:27:32 -0000
Received: from n12.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.62) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 01:27:32 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3062-1003368473-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.56] by n12.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2001 01:27:53 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 01:27:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 84957 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 01:27:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 01:27:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 01:27:53 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id SAA05199 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:27:53 -0700
Message-Id: <200110180127.SAA05199@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:SANS.says.federal.contracts.should.require.security.standards.should.be.met.for.computers]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Federal officials have awakened to the realization that they may have
funded the computers most likely to be used in terrorist cyberattacks.
Universities that deployed the vulnerable systems have gotten the same
message. The first step in solving the problem is to add language to
federal contracts and grants requiring technical security standards
be met on all federally supported computers. If you are involved in
security of university-based computers, your comments and suggestions
can help. Please review the draft language in the RFC at the end of
this NewsBites and get back to us by Friday.
AP
...
------------------
http://all.net/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST