Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3244-1003762139-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26992 invoked by uid 510); 22 Oct 2001 14:48:29 -0000 Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.51) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2001 14:48:29 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3244-1003762139-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.1.222] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2001 14:48:59 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 22 Oct 2001 14:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8019 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2001 14:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 22 Oct 2001 14:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2001 14:48:58 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9MEnFG05199 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:49:15 -0700 Message-Id: <200110221449.f9MEnFG05199@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:Jet.Makers.Use.Patriotic.Theme.In.Bid.For.Contract] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit New York Times October 20, 2001 Jet Makers Use Patriotic Theme In Bid For Contract By Alessandra Stanley The men and women who defend our nation's freedom are the best in the world," a radio advertisement now being broadcast in Washington says. The spot is not just an attempt to lift morale, however. "And they deserve the best equipment," it continues. "That is what the Boeing Joint Strike Fighter is all about." The Boeing advertisement is the final pitch in a long and costly advertising and lobbying campaign to persuade the Pentagon to pick its aircraft over a model by Lockheed Martin. The winning prototype will secure the most lucrative military contract in history, the Joint Strike Fighter program estimated to be worth more than $200 billion. The Boeing spot's patriotic undertones blend with the new mood on television and in advertising, from the "Keep America Rolling" automobile ads by General Motors to the red, white and blue peacock on the NBC logo. But the direct promotion of military hardware could be jarring at a time when the country is under terrorist attack and at war in Afghanistan. To some, it sounds as though Boeing is taking advantage of a newly martial spirit to secure a Pentagon contract. Or so its rival suggests. James Fetig, a Lockheed spokesman, said that Lockheed resumed running print ads for its own Joint Strike Fighter model in The Washington Post and trade publications on Monday, and only after it saw that Boeing was pressing ahead with radio and print ads. "We didn't want to run advertising for military equipment that could look like we are seeking to profit from the tragedy," Mr. Fetig said, noting that Lockheed had pulled all its ads after Sept. 11. So had Boeing. Asked if enough time had passed to resume advertising, Mr. Fetig replied dryly, "Our competitor seems to think so." Thomas R. Young, Boeing's director of advertising for military aircraft and missile systems, said that Boeing had halted its advertising campaign as "inappropriate" following the attacks, but resumed radio commercials on Oct. 3, and print advertisements in The Washington Post and The Washington Times Oct. 4 and 5. The Pentagon is scheduled to announce the winner of the contract next Friday, though a report by the Congress's General Accounting Office critical of the plane's technology raised the possibility of a delay. Mr. Young said that the radio spots and print advertisements did not exploit the crisis because "decision-makers already know that the fighter would not be ready in time to be of service in Afghanistan." These days all advertisers tread on delicate ground. Most Americans have accepted the notion that buying is patriotic, a way to aid an imperiled economy. But the act of selling - whether a product or company image - remains more ambiguous. A Washington lawyer who represents military contractors said that he has advised his clients to avoid aggressive advertising or litigation that could suggest to the public that they were focused on anything other than serving the nation. For more than six years, Boeing and Lockheed have vied to produce a fighter-bomber that could replace aging aircraft in three services - Air Force F-16's and A-10's, Navy F- 14's and F-18's and Marine Corps Harriers - as well as be used by the British Royal Navy and Air Force. The project calls for 3,000 new planes over 20 years. Officials who helped initiate the fighter program did not seem offended by the rivals' last-ditch effort to push their prototypes. "This is the biggest program in history and they can't resist playing up their benefits," said Jacques S. Gansler, a professor at the University of Maryland who was under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics during the Clinton administration. "I am just not sure any of these ads will have an impact," Mr. Gansler added. The Boeing radio advertisements, which were scheduled to start on Sept. 12 and were held back after the attacks until Oct. 3, do not directly refer to the terrorist attacks or to the retaliatory bombing in Afghanistan. Still, some listeners in the Washington area said they thought there was a link. One reason could be that these days, any mention of the American military seems connected to the conflict in Afghanistan and at home. Boeing's television commercials, also broadcast in the Washington area, do not mention the fighter. Instead, they are a salute to brave young men and women in uniform, a campaign that was actually produced six years ago. Boeing changed some words of the narration and began broadcasting it after Sept. 20 to show its corporate solidarity with the war effort. The ad is a gauzy montage of images of soldiers and sailors; a female vocalist sings "America the Beautiful." Before Sept. 11, Boeing had also broadcast TV commercials for its Joint Strike Fighter, placed mostly during Sunday-morning talk shows. Anne Toulouse, director of corporate brand advertising at Boeing, said that after the attack, those ads were replaced with the salute to the men and women in uniform. "We did an assessment three of four weeks ago and concluded that we had to be careful about a hard sell," Ms. Toulouse said. "The tone had to be very careful so the message is not misperceived." Lockheed has also revived television ads that feature a similar tribute, a "Salute to the Armed Forces" - which also combines images of military personnel, somber words and stirring music - that was originally produced to celebrate Armed Forces Day. "Whatever you think of defense contractors, we are very patriotic people," Mr. Fetig said. Mr. Young of Boeing concurred. "Any company, ours or Lockheed, has a lot of former military people in it," he said. "They have a pretty good feel for what is appropriate." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide! http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:56 PST