[iwar] [fc:Bioweapons.alerts.may.cause.lasting.psychological.harm]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-22 07:54:35


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3247-1003762460-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27237 invoked by uid 510); 22 Oct 2001 14:53:51 -0000
Received: from n2.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.52) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2001 14:53:51 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3247-1003762460-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n2.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2001 14:54:20 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 22 Oct 2001 14:54:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 84697 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2001 14:54:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 22 Oct 2001 14:54:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2001 14:54:19 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9MEsau05340 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:54:36 -0700
Message-Id: <200110221454.f9MEsau05340@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Bioweapons.alerts.may.cause.lasting.psychological.harm]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Bioweapons alerts may cause lasting psychological harm
 
10:09   19  October  01
Will Knight

Mounting fear over anthrax attacks and the potential for other
biological and chemical weapons attacks could have a long-lasting
psychological effect on many people, even if the incidents themselves
remain sporadic, say medical researchers in the UK and US. 

They warn that authorities in many countries could inadvertently worsen
the situation by over-reacting and proposing countermeasures, such as
chemical sensors on subway systems. 

"It may be unwise to send in men in white suits for what are relatively
low-risk situations," co-author Simon Wessely, of the Institute of
Psychiatry at Kings College London, told New Scientist.  "If there are
terrorists behind these attacks, that is what they want."

The likelihood of causing extensive psychological damage by fitting
underground sensors far outweighs the likelihood of the sensors saving
lives, they say.  To date, 50 people have tested positive for anthrax
exposure, 46 in the US, but there have been thousands of hoaxes around
the world. 

Terror tactics

The psychological damage caused by heavy-handed reactions could
eventually manifest itself in mistrust of government experts, says the
team. 

It could also lead to unwarranted increased media and public speculation
over the long-term health effects of low-level exposure to chemical and
biological agents.  The authors say that similar uncertainty followed
the use of chemical weapons on soldiers in the Gulf and the Balkans. 

Wessely says that biological and chemical weapons are less effective
than bombs and guns, but can inspire more fear and uncertainty: "Anthrax
is a lousy weapon.  But it is the hidden menace."

"Out of proportion"

Others agree that the terrorist attacks should not cause undue concern. 

"Any serious scientist is going to say when you look at the figures it
is out of proportion," says Leslie Carrick-Smith, an independent UK
expert on the psychologist effects of disasters.  "A few people have
been affected and 50 million have become very anxious."

Wessely believes that the public must treat the threat of biological and
chemical attack as minimal.  "The solution is to remember that we can
deal with it, unless we overreact, as they seem to be doing in America,"
he says. 

Journal reference: British Medical Journal (vol 323, p 878)

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:56 PST