[iwar] [fc:U.S..Faces.Public-Relations.War]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-24 10:25:31


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3369-1003944305-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f9OHkud12013 for <fc@localhost>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:46:56 -0700
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14847 invoked by uid 510); 24 Oct 2001 17:24:32 -0000
Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.51) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 17:24:32 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3369-1003944305-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.222] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2001 17:25:05 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 24 Oct 2001 17:25:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 26945 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2001 17:25:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 24 Oct 2001 17:25:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 17:25:05 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9OHPVe11545 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:25:31 -0700
Message-Id: <200110241725.f9OHPVe11545@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:U.S..Faces.Public-Relations.War]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Washington Times
October 24, 2001
Pg. 17
U.S. Faces Public-Relations War 
By Betsy Pisik, The Washington Times
NEW YORK - A top diplomat of Afghanistan's Taliban regime called a press
conference in Pakistan to announce that the U.S.-led alliance had
intentionally bombed a hospital in western Afghanistan, killing more than
100 doctors, nurses and patients and strafing the area with chemical and
biological weapons.
"It is now clear that American plans are intentionally targeting the Afghan
people," said Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban's ambassador to Pakistan,
estimating Monday that at least 1,000 civilians have been killed in nearly
three weeks of military strikes.
"The goal is to punish the Afghan people for having  chosen an Islamic
system."
While more than 5,000 people died in the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon, the United States finds itself in an unexpectedly
difficult global public relations war over who is the greater victim in the
global anti-terrorism campaign.
U.S. officials have denounced the Taliban's casualty counts as inflated, but
the regime's constant claims and comments have greatly alarmed Muslims
throughout the region.
A fundamentalist Islamic regime that bans radios and shocked the world with
its destruction earlier this year of ancient Buddhist statues has proven
surprisingly astute at waging a modern media campaign to discredit the
U.S.-led bombing and now ground attacks.
The Pentagon - which has forcefully denied using chemical or biological
weapons - also has rejected the Taliban's casualty figures.
"The numbers the Taliban has been floating out in the media are, we are
certain, false," said Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld at a press
briefing last week. "The information from the ground tends to be
self-serving."
In many Arab and Muslim nations, however, demonstrations against the
U.S.-led bombardment have grown larger and more urgent as pictures of dead
children and bombed homes are disseminated.
The Pentagon yesterday conceded hitting a senior citizens' facility in
Herat, less than 300 yards from an intended military target. There was no
estimate on casualties.
Nonetheless, U.S. officials say the Taliban regime is manipulating the
casualty figures to enhance sympathy for its cause, and foment resentment of
the West.
Saudi Arabia and Iran, which both condemned the Sept. 11 attacks, are not
likely to be shaken, said analysts, because they want to see bin Laden and
the Taliban regime neutralized as much as the United States does.
"They'll probably still cooperate, but cautiously," said Michael Dunn,
editor of the Middle East Journal. "And they'll continue to underplay their
involvement for reasons of internal consumption."
There is almost no way to document Taliban casualty claims. Independent
verification is nearly impossible without reporters, aid workers, diplomats
or other reliable witnesses on the scene.
But Mr. Dunn said that Washington could do more to counter the Taliban
claims, and be more aggressive in winning over terrified Afghans and furious
Pakistanis.
"We may not have [been] quick enough in some cases here to respond to
reports of civilian casualties," he said yesterday. "We may not be moving as
quickly as our adversaries in explaining it."
Amr Moussa, secretary-general of the Arab League, warned yesterday that
Washington will find it very difficult to win over the Arabs and Muslims who
are convinced that the United States has unconditionally supported Israel in
its conflict with the Palestinians and manipulated U.N. sanctions to punish
ordinary Iraqis.
"The images that are coming out of Afghanistan reinforce that popular
opinion, and inflame it," concurred Ray Takeyh, a research fellow at the
Washington Institute for Near East Institute.
He said that the Middle East and Iraq aren't connected to the Afghanistan
action, "but they reinforce the perception of an imperious American attitude
toward Arab suffering."

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:57 PST