RE: [iwar] [fc:Arab.world.poverty.--.whose.fault?]

From: e.r. (fastflyer28@yahoo.com)
Date: 2001-10-27 13:17:54


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3533-1004213876-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32182 invoked by uid 510); 27 Oct 2001 20:17:17 -0000
Received: from n30.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.80) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2001 20:17:17 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3533-1004213876-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.52] by n30.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2001 20:17:56 -0000
X-Sender: fastflyer28@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 27 Oct 2001 20:17:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 87244 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2001 20:17:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Oct 2001 20:17:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web14503.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.224.66) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2001 20:17:55 -0000
Message-ID: <20011027201754.59782.qmail@web14503.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [12.78.121.66] by web14503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:17:54 PDT
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011026221012.00c29440@embassy.org>
From: "e.r." <fastflyer28@yahoo.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fastflyer28
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] [fc:Arab.world.poverty.--.whose.fault?]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I Might point out that the US had no involvement other than supplying
the anti-Soviet afgans with weapons. We plyed no role other that prior
to Sept 11. Unlike Vietnam, we played only a cameo in this fight.  You
disappointment me with your lack of understanding of the present
situation.   We never were active players in the war with Russia. While
we worked out of pakistan to supply weapons. what the Pakistanias did
in that war ia  There problems is for them to answer for.

Afganistan was not even a strategic partner.  See China if yoy see who
helped us keep tabs on the Soviets during this time/
--- Ross Stapleton-Gray <amicus@well.com> wrote:
> At 10:21 PM 10/26/01 -0700, e.r. wrote:
> >Whose fault is the peoples suffering? The bad guys can start taking
> >numbers.  We just came on the scene after 11 Sept...
> 
> Huh?  The situation in Afghanistan is certainly in part due to our
> past 
> involvement, for good or ill; the U.S., with Pakistan as a channel,
> pumped 
> resources into Afghanistan to fight the USSR in one of the last proxy
> wars 
> of the Cold War.
> 
> One might speculate what would have happened had the U.S. not
> promoted the 
> Mujaheddin as insurgents against the Soviets... might Afghanistan
> have been 
> more like Mongolia, i.e., loosely in the Soviet sphere of influence,
> then 
> cut loose when the Soviet empire fell apart?  What we've now got, to
> some 
> extent, are chickens coming home to roost.
> 
> Ross
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:57 PST