Re: [iwar] [fc:Sensitivity,.Ramadhan,.friends,.and.a.non-existent.coalition]

From: Mandeep Singh Bajwa (bajwa@i91.net.in)
Date: 2001-10-29 11:35:32


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3598-1004384119-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:36:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16211 invoked by uid 510); 29 Oct 2001 19:34:38 -0000
Received: from n6.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.56) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 19:34:38 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3598-1004384119-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.224] by n6.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Oct 2001 19:35:20 -0000
X-Sender: bajwa@i91.net.in
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 29 Oct 2001 19:35:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 21598 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 19:35:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.224 with QMQP; 29 Oct 2001 19:35:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.i91.net.in) (203.145.138.112) by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 19:34:54 -0000
Received: from m2c4s9 (ra6.i91.net.in [203.200.97.116]) by mail.i91.net.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA19588 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:04:54 +0530
Message-ID: <003a01c160b0$f53cd600$361510ac@m2c4s9>
To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com>
References: <002101c1604d$2b20c240$6301a8c0@crestech.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
From: "Mandeep Singh Bajwa" <bajwa@i91.net.in>
X-Yahoo-Profile: mandeep_bajwa
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:05:32 +0530
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] [fc:Sensitivity,.Ramadhan,.friends,.and.a.non-existent.coalition]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just one example of Muslims waging war against war during Ramzan. The slaughter of innocent Muslims and the rape of Muslim women by Pakistani Muslim soldiers did not slacken up during Ramzan (Oct-Nov) in Bangla Desh in 1971. And this is not perception but the cold, hard facts.

Mandeep Singh Bajwa
South Asia Editor
Orders of Battle Internet Magazine
http://orbat.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mohammad Ozair Rasheed 
  To: Info War 
  Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:11 PM
  Subject: RE: [iwar] [fc:Sensitivity,.Ramadhan,.friends,.and.a.non-existent.coalition]



  Just one comment

  I believe that US has been trying very hard to point out that this is
  not war against Muslims :)

  Regards,
  Ozair

  P.S. Mr. Bajwa: Nice to see you come out of 'perceptive' mood.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Mandeep Singh Bajwa [mailto:bajwa@i91.net.in] 
  Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:01 PM
  To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [iwar]
  [fc:Sensitivity,.Ramadhan,.friends,.and.a.non-existent.coalition]


  Correct ! History is replete with instances where Muslims waged war
  during Ramzan.  
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Fred Cohen 
    To: Information Warfare Mailing List 
    Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:44 AM
    Subject: [iwar]
  [fc:Sensitivity,.Ramadhan,.friends,.and.a.non-existent.coalition]


    [Analysts Note: This fawning of Senator Biden over Sec. Powell can
  only be
    witnessed as an attempt to curry favor with the State Department and
    its numerous, Arabist members. It is unfortunate that the head of the
    Senate Foreign Relations Committee does not know that Israel was
    attacked by Muslims in 1973 during the Jewish holiest day of Yom
    Kippor AND during Ramadhan. Indeed, the 1973 war is known among
    Muslims as the Ramadhan War. Are we to understand a unilateral, U.S.
    dictate exists that says that while Muslims are allowed to attack
    during Ramadhan, they cannot be attacked?
    The president has said repeatedly that Bin Laden hi-jacked a religion;
    why is Senator Biden so concerned about bombing during Ramadhan those
    who are described as religious hi-jackers?
    Are the Muslim citizens of the U.S. united with the nation over the
    new anti-terrorism legislation, leading to the question: where is
    Senator Biden getting his information.]

    HEARING OF THE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE SUBJECT:
    INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST TERRORISM CHAIRED BY: SENATOR JOE BIDEN
    (D-DE) WITNESS: SECRETARY OF STATE COLIN POWELL LOCATION: 325 RUSSELL
    SENATE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 2:15 P.M. EDT DATE:
    THURSDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2001
    --------
    SEN. BIDEN: The hearing will come to order.
    Welcome, Mr. Secretary. Our colleagues will be filing in as the vote
    winds down. I guess it wound down now. And they'll have an opportunity
    to question. But I think in the interest of your time, we should
    begin.
    With your permission, if and when we get a quorum here, which I fully
    expect, we may interrupt you and pass out 12 ambassadorial nominees
    while we have a quorum, if we can. I'm sure that won't offend you.
    SEC. POWELL: It will not offend me in the slightest, Mr. Chairman.
    SEN. BIDEN: Well, Mr. Secretary, I want to compliment you personally,
    and I want to compliment the president on the way you have both united
    the nation and, I think equally important, in a sense, for this
    undertaking, clearly equally as important, the way you have put
    together a coalition of the willing here, and some of the timid, it
    seems to me. You put together a coalition of not only our traditional
    friends, but you put together a coalition of our friends in the Muslim

    world, as well as some who are not automatically considered to be
    rallying to our concerns and needs.We need the support in the Islamic
    world, as you know better than I do. And as you said yesterday about
    bombing during Ramadan, we'll do what we need to do, but we'll be
    sensitive to that concern.
    I think the president has been incredibly skillful, along with you, in
    keeping the coalition together; in keeping Muslim leaders on board who
    are experiencing demonstrations and protests about U.S. bombings, and
    accusations that we're attacking the whole Islamic world, which is
    simply not true. And it's also significant credit to your personal
    diplomacy.
    Let me say that I cannot speak for all Democrats -- I don't think
    there's ever been a man or woman born that could speak for all
    Democrats -- but I am confident when I say both political parties are
    united in our resolve to pursue and conclude successfully this war,
    and to support the president's efforts. The world should know that we
    support our president and our military forces in their mission. To the
    best of my knowledge, there's no daylight, no daylight, between the
    parties -- or between the Congress and the administration on the way
    in which you are pursuing this effort.
    The world should also know that there's broad agreement not only on
    eliminating Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network, as well as the
    Taliban that supports him, but there's also broad agreement and
    support for the president's resolve to keep a coalition together to
    help feed displaced Afghans, as well as put together, possibly with an
    extraterritorial help, with the United Nations or some other
    international fora, a viable government that will be a source of
    stability and not a source of unrest, after we successfully prosecute
    this war effort.
    I need not tell you this won't be easy. But be assured, many of us
    will stand shoulder to shoulder with you in what are bound to be some
    very difficult decisions you and the president are going to have to
    make.
    And on that score I'd like to personally thank you for keeping me and
    the ranking member, who is still my chairman, and all the committee,
    informed. There has never been a time, speaking for myself, that I
    have ever called you or called any of your people that I haven't
    gotten an immediate response, and the same can be said for
    Senator Helms, and, I expect, for all of our colleagues here. And I
    think to state the obvious, that's awfully important, to keep this
    kind of cohesion which you've put in place.
    And I also want to publicly acknowledge how much I personally
    appreciate -- and Senator Helms can clearly speak for himself -- the
    personal briefings he and I together and separately have received from
    the President of the United States. This has not been an on-again,
    off-again thing. It's been roughly about once every week or 10 days
    he's had us down there. And he's not only telling us what's going on,
    but genuinely asking for input. And I've been impressed. I've been
    impressed. So impressed that publicly some of my colleagues wonder
    whether or not I am under his influence. And I've said to them what
    I'll say to you: as long as he's right, I am for him. I am for him,
    and I think he's doing it the right way.
    So, Mr. Secretary, there are going to be, as I said -- you know better
    than we, having prosecuted another difficult war. This one, I think,
    is even more complicated -- that there's going to be some tough
    decisions. It'll be really easy to Monday morning quarterback. I
    commit to you that I will not do that, and I don't think most of us up

    here will do that. We know this is risky business, and this is very
    difficult.
    And one example is, if the newspaper is correct, Tuesday's successful
    mission in Kabul shows the importance of our air power and the
    partnership with folks on the ground who are in the coalition, of
    those assets working together. If the initial reports are accurate, we
    targeted and killed 22 hard-core terrorists linked to bin Laden in
    a single pinpoint strike, based on human intelligence provided from
    ground assets. That requires both things. It requires the air and the
    coalition. And we carried this out without jeopardizing U.S.
    servicemen and -- unnecessarily and without causing any collateral
    damage.
    And so they are the success stories, and they are significant. We're
    going to hear the occasional mistake. I hope the American people can
    keep this in perspective, and I believe they will, that there will be
    some collateral damage. But that's a decision, a tough decision the
    president is going to have to constantly make.
    So, Mr. Secretary, you just returned from Shanghai, where you said, as
    you have the ability to do better than most, you capsulized in one
    sentence how the world has changed. You said, "Not only is the Cold
    War over," you said, "the post-Cold War is over." And out of the
    tragedy on 9/11, and from the president's initiative and your
    diplomacy building this worldwide coalition, I believe we have a
    number of opportunities to enhance our relationships with countries
    from Russia to China and possibly even change on the margins the
    dynamics with Iran. And I believe if we succeed in seizing these
    opportunities, continuing the path the president has put us on, the
    21st century has the significant possibility of being safer than the
    20th century. And you and the president, if that occurs, will have
    made a historic contribution to the well being of this nation.I yield
    to my friend, Senator Helms.
    SEN. JESSE HELMS (R-NC): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As a matter of
    personal privilege, let me say that this morning, about 6:15 when I
    was reading the newspapers, I ran across an item about the
    distinguished chairman of this committee. I said this cannot be so,
    because both papers that I saw implied strongly, if they did not state
    outright, that Joe Biden has broken with bipartisan support for the
    president.Now, Senator Biden and I attend a lot of meetings at the
    White
    House and sit side by side with the president, and I know how this
    fellow operates, and I know that those reports were not accurate. And
    I understand how first-hand accounts can happen, but I want to do what
    the chairman is not going to do I'm sure, and I want to say that these
    reports were taken out of context and were not accurate.
    SEN. BIDEN: Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman.

          Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
         
         

    ------------------
    http://all.net/ 

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  ------------------
  http://all.net/ 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
       
       

  ------------------
  http://all.net/ 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:58 PST