[iwar] [fc:U.S..builds.up.cyberwar.arsenal]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-11-10 17:43:34
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Security.issue.will.be.fixed.-.experts.[not.me...]]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Hart.Warned.On.Terror,.But.Bush.Didn't.Listen]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200111110143.fAB1hYM03099@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:U.S..builds.up.cyberwar.arsenal]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

U.S. builds up cyberwar arsenal 
Reuters, 11/9/2001
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7816387.html?tag=owv">http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7816387.html?tag=owv>

WASHINGTON -- Even as it fights in Afghanistan with bombs and guns and
allies on horseback, the U.S. military is gearing up to use computers
and code as potentially decisive weapons in the next phases of its
campaign.

The goal would be to disable air defense systems, scramble enemy
logistics and perhaps infect software through tactics being honed by a
joint task force set up in 1999 under the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based
U.S. Space Command.

If Afghanistan were home to anything but one of the world's least
computer-reliant societies, U.S. forces might have kicked off the
campaign they began Oct. 7 with keyboard-launched strikes to disrupt the
Taliban militia's command and control.

But a cyberblitz would have had scant impact on Afghanistan, one of only
a handful of nations that never even bothered to touch base with a
United Nations network that prepped governments for feared Year 2000
computer disruptions.

"They're just not connected," said information security strategist Bruce
McConnell, who tried unsuccessfully to include the Taliban in the
International Y2K Cooperation Center he headed under U.N. aegis.

In addition, since the start of the U.S.-led campaign against Afghan
protectors of terror suspect Osama bin Laden, "we've seen absolutely no
indication of terrorists attacking via cyberspace," Space Command
spokesman Army Maj. Barry Venable said.

The U.S. military has been working on tools that could wreak electronic
havoc on countries accused of harboring terrorists as well as on ways of
defending global networks against cyberattack.

"Transformation cannot wait," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said
last week, using military jargon for souping up U.S. forces to meet
21st-century threats and to cash in on high-tech covert capabilities.

"We must act now to prepare for the next war, even as we wage the
current war against terrorism," he wrote in a Nov. 1 The Washington Post
guest column.

After the Sept. 11 blitz that turned civilian airliners into missiles,
killing some 4,800 people, the United States must plan for new and
different foes who will rely on "surprise, deception and asymmetric
weapons," or those meant to overcome the lopsided U.S. edge in
conventional arms, Rumsfeld said. "To deal with those future surprises,
we must move rapidly now to improve our ability to protect U.S.
information systems and ensure persistent surveillance, tracking and
rapid engagement of an adversary's forces and capabilities," he said.

The Defense Department has been readying to make cyberblitzes on enemy
computer networks a standard tool of war, Air Force Gen. Richard Myers,
now Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said earlier this year as he
left the Space Command.

Army Gen. Henry Shelton, Myers' predecessor as the top U.S. military
officer, confirmed that the United States had jabbed electronically into
Serbian computer networks throughout the 78-day NATO bombing campaign
over Kosovo in 1999.

Unspecified hostile countries have probed U.S. computer networks for
ways to spark mayhem in wartime, Richard Clarke, the White House
National Security Council staff coordinator for security, infrastructure
protection and counter-terrorism, said in June.

"This is not theoretical. It's real," Clarke said at the time. He was
tapped by President Bush on Oct. 16 to head a new senior advisory board
on critical infrastructure protection--in other words, the country's
vital communications, transportation, food and health care systems.

CIA and Pentagon war games already feature foes using bits and bytes,
not bombs or ballistic missiles, to attack U.S. financial institutions,
communications hubs and spy satellites.

Guerrilla forces are bound to turn to cyberweapons to wage their battles
in an increasingly networked future, just as political activists have
used denial-of-service attacks and Web page defacements to amplify their
messages.

"As we harden our bridges, airports and other infrastructure, terrorists
are going to seek the path of least resistance," said Steven Roberts, a
computer security expert at Georgetown University. "That means they're
likely to embrace information warfare tools such as viruses, Trojan
Horses and password crackers."

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
Refill any ink cartridge for less!
Includes black and color ink.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/r9F0cB/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Security.issue.will.be.fixed.-.experts.[not.me...]]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Hart.Warned.On.Terror,.But.Bush.Didn't.Listen]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:59 PST