[iwar] [fc:Security.issue.will.be.fixed.-.experts.[not.me...]]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-11-10 17:45:37


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3839-1005443113-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4571 invoked by uid 510); 11 Nov 2001 01:44:09 -0000
Received: from n9.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.59) by all.net with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 01:44:09 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3839-1005443113-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [10.1.1.220] by n9.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2001 01:45:13 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 11 Nov 2001 01:45:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 21115 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 01:45:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Nov 2001 01:45:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 01:45:13 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fAB1jbO03139 for iwar@onelist.com; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:45:37 -0800
Message-Id: <200111110145.fAB1jbO03139@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Security.issue.will.be.fixed.-.experts.[not.me...]]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Security issue will be fixed - experts

Nicole Bellamy, ZDNet Australia, 11/9/2001
<a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2098848,00.html">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2098848,00.html>

Consumers' lack of faith in the safety of e-business may be misplaced,
but businesses need to work harder towards strengthening their systems 
Throughout the dot-com boom to bust, security and privacy issues have
continued to be underestimated in terms of importance to e-business.
Australian experts warn this may cause more failures, while
simultaneously claiming these issues "will be fixed". 
The dot-com boom saw a plethora of new companies, often steered by young
and untested entrepreneurs, embracing the hype about the Internet's
business capabilities and jumping in headfirst. The subsequent bust
proved that to be a success, companies needed more than a great idea and
a Web site. 
With the benefit of hindsight, and a multitude of 'expert' opinions,
surveys, and results, organisations are now beginning to realise there
is more to e-business than establishing a Web site and selling a product
-- and that many of the challenges arise from consumers themselves. 
A panel of Australian IT professionals gathered at the e-Business Expo
and Commonwealth Bank Business World Expo 2001 event last week to
discuss particular challenges inhibiting the growth of e-business in
Australia -- that of the security and privacy issues. 
"People just don't trust the (e-business) system," said professional
facilitator, Peter Couchman. 
The panel elaborated, pointing to the fact that end-users are highly
sceptical about the security of the Internet as a medium for transacting
and revealing personal details. 
According to Couchman, much of this can be attributed to the fact that
"businesses have continued to seriously underestimate security and
privacy as issues for business on the Internet." 
National Office for the Information Economy (NOIE)'s chief executive,
John Rimmer, stated that now is the time for companies to be developing
solid business plans, part of which must include security plans. He
added that e-business as a whole "needs new technology...regulated
environment, plus education of people (as to the fact) that there are
different levels of security required for different tasks." 
Steve Benfield, chief technology officer for SilverStream Software
agreed that education -- or the lack thereof -- is a major inhibitor to
the take up of transacting, or revealing private data, online. According
to Benfield, it is often a misperception on part of the end user about
the relative security the Internet can provide. 
"End users fail to understand that there is more chance of someone going
through your garbage, getting a credit card receipt, using the number
and ripping you off, rather than grabbing your details online," Benfield
said. 
The recent increase in the development of both new technolgies and
legislation, is attempting to take this education in hand, as well as to
provide a solid security structure to ease the minds of end-users, be
they consumers or businesses. 
One such development has been the reworking of the Privacy Act and the
upcoming Amendment. 
"Changes to the Privacy act means that corporates are more accountable
and more responsible," said Sladjan Jovic, managing director for Biodata
Technology Australia. 
Jovic added that much of the responsibility belongs to the end user, and
more focus should be placed on authentication. He claimed that while
many organisations are turning to new technologies and systems to
improve the authentication process, many of these are lacking a
technological means of adding 'user presence'. 
This user presence is important in that it ensures the user is
physically present at the time of authentication, and reduces the
possibility of identity theft and criminal access to the authentication
process. 
Jovic stated that the lack of user presence is being addressed by many
companies involved with biometric research. He claimed that biometrics,
especially in the form of smart cards -- memory-based cards that record
the user's biometric traits -- do add user presence to the
authentication process. 
Paul Houghton, managing director of Microsoft Australia, implied that
the security and privacy issues will only be resolved with a concerted
effort by industry groups, rather than the development of a particular
product. This effort is already underway, according to Houghton. 
"Industry, retailers, government are all playing a very important roles
in developing technologies and standards that ensure security," said
Houghton. 
According to Houghton, resolution will occur, and in the not-so distant
future, which will lower this particular barrier to e-business success. 
"Soon, there will be some type of authentication system or systems in
place as a standard for all transactions," said Houghton. "And the
security issue will be fixed."

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:59 PST