Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4083-1008600815-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 17 Dec 2001 06:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 15084 invoked by uid 510); 17 Dec 2001 14:53:42 -0000 Received: from n13.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.63) by all.net with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 14:53:42 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4083-1008600815-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [216.115.97.190] by n13.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2001 14:44:14 -0000 X-Sender: lzkoch@attbi.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 17 Dec 2001 14:53:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 98352 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 14:53:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m4.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Dec 2001 14:53:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com) (216.148.227.88) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 14:53:32 -0000 Received: from CB348209-B.attbi.com ([12.248.10.50]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20011217145331.BFB2242.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@CB348209-B.attbi.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:53:31 +0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011217084325.01c36118@mail.attbi.com> X-Sender: lzkoch@attbi.com@mail.attbi.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 To: iwar@yahoogroups.com,iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200112170536.fBH5avR20323@red.all.net> References: <DCENJMMKBFJDGHBNFKBLEEIODDAA.junkmail@barnowl.com> From: "Lewis Z. Koch" <lzkoch@attbi.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:53:15 -0600 Subject: Re: [iwar] Did this list lose its focus? Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fred said: >The way to alter the behavior of the forum is to start discussiong the >issues that arise. I, for one, am interested in all views. > >I have come to believe that high quality information warfare involves >deep thought and understanding of behaviors. I have spent some >considerable time lately looking at these issues and applying them in a >practical sense - hence some of the recent papers at all.net. I would >love to hear other views and see information on other researchers' >results. Personally, I would like to see the forum opened up a tad -- but only a tad. If it isn't too much work, I'd prefer Fred choose what letters/people he includes or excludes. Of course I'd like to see Rob's comments (after all, I write for Vmths.com). Those who have substantial interest, and can add new and solid information, hey, I'm up for that. But the last thing I want is a list with people debating string theory or worse, arguing about gun control. More information, in and by itself, is just noise. Opening it up to more "signals" is great. More good information that is sourced can only add to our mine of information. Lew Koch [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Unlimited PC-PC calling at Crystal Voice! - Only $1/Mo. Download your free 30 day trial. Click here. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gb1xVB/GxbDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 21:00:00 PST