Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1190-988927714-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 May 2001 15:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19536 invoked by uid 510); 3 May 2001 21:09:53 -0000 Received: from hp.egroups.com (208.50.99.201) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 3 May 2001 21:09:53 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1190-988927714-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.55] by hp.egroups.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2001 22:08:35 -0000 X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 3 May 2001 22:08:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 3651 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 22:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 May 2001 22:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-1.llnl.gov) (128.115.250.81) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 May 2001 22:07:49 -0000 Received: from poptop.llnl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-1.llnl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3/LLNL-gateway-1.0) with ESMTP id PAA12964 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 3 May 2001 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from catalyst.llnl.gov (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id PAA22088 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 3 May 2001 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010503150544.00aeef00@poptop.llnl.gov> X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200105031450.HAA04491@all.net> From: Tony Bartoletti <azb@llnl.gov> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 15:12:30 -0700 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] interesting piece Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit At 07:50 AM 5/3/01 -0700, you wrote: >by James Adams [snip] >U.S. military leaders increasingly recognize that losing information >battles will undermine the country's ability to fight any battles at all. >Missile defense, for example, will not be worth the billions it will cost >if digital attacks undermine its software or infrastructure. And opponents >of missile defense could handicap the system at the development stage by >attacking the technology at its source -- breaking into the computer >networks of the corporations that design the system and making slight >modifications that ensure huge costs and long delays. Hmmm. So, if a full-scale missile defense program is initiated, and it incurs huge costs and long delays (a virtual certainty for a wide variety of reasons,) then we can probably point to those "opponents of missile defense" for having hacked into and sabotaged the source codes. Right. ___tony___ Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881 <azb@llnl.gov> Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94551-9900 ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:10 PDT