Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1194-988934192-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 May 2001 16:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26244 invoked by uid 510); 3 May 2001 22:57:36 -0000 Received: from b05.egroups.com (208.50.144.96) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 3 May 2001 22:57:36 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1194-988934192-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.53] by b05.egroups.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2001 23:56:32 -0000 X-Sender: glenn.williamson@sympatico.ca X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 3 May 2001 23:56:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 84493 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 23:56:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 May 2001 23:56:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net) (209.226.175.35) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 May 2001 23:56:30 -0000 Received: from home ([209.226.118.35]) by tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with SMTP id <20010503235629.DSMR28559.tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net@home> for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 3 May 2001 19:56:29 -0400 To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <001901c0d42d$6aa52ac0$2376e2d1@home> X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010503150544.00aeef00@poptop.llnl.gov> Importance: High X-eGroups-From: "Glenn Williamson" <glenn.williamson@sympatico.ca> From: "Glenn Williamson" <Glenn_Williamson@ottawa.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 20:01:49 -0400 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] interesting piece Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, I will agree with that, but then again, those missile defences will protect my country too, or will they see Canada as an enemy for the amount of hacking that routes through Canada. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Bartoletti [mailto:azb@llnl.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 6:13 PM To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] interesting piece At 07:50 AM 5/3/01 -0700, you wrote: >by James Adams [snip] >U.S. military leaders increasingly recognize that losing information >battles will undermine the country's ability to fight any battles at all. >Missile defense, for example, will not be worth the billions it will cost >if digital attacks undermine its software or infrastructure. And opponents >of missile defense could handicap the system at the development stage by >attacking the technology at its source -- breaking into the computer >networks of the corporations that design the system and making slight >modifications that ensure huge costs and long delays. Hmmm. So, if a full-scale missile defense program is initiated, and it incurs huge costs and long delays (a virtual certainty for a wide variety of reasons,) then we can probably point to those "opponents of missile defense" for having hacked into and sabotaged the source codes. Right. ___tony___ Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881 <azb@llnl.gov> Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94551-9900 ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:10 PDT