[iwar] [fc:Governor.Calls.for.'Cyber.Court']

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-18 08:53:10


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3105-1003420392-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19636 invoked by uid 510); 18 Oct 2001 15:52:50 -0000
Received: from n15.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.65) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:52:50 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3105-1003420392-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.56] by n15.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2001 15:53:10 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 15:53:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 41225 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 15:53:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 15:53:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:53:11 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id IAA14865 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:53:11 -0700
Message-Id: <200110181553.IAA14865@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Governor.Calls.for.'Cyber.Court']
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Governor Calls for 'Cyber Court'  
By Declan McCullagh, Wired News, 10/18/2001 http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,47676,00.html

WASHINGTON -- Malicious hackers, look out. 
A government anti-terrorism commission will recommend that Congress
create a shadowy court to oversee investigations of suspected computer
intruders. 
Gov. James Gilmore (R-Virginia), the commission's chairman, said
Wednesday that federal judges have been far too sluggish in approving
search warrants and eavesdropping of online miscreants. 
Instead, Gilmore told the House Science committee, the commission will
recommend that a "cyber court" be created with extraordinary powers to
authorize electronic surveillance and secret searches of suspected
hackers' homes and offices. 
Police investigations are currently hamstrung by a lack of "effective
procedures and understanding by many in the judiciary concerning the
nature and urgency of cyber security," Gilmore said. 
Wednesday's hearing comes after members of the House and Senate voted
overwhelmingly last week to grant police more surveillance powers,
including the ability to conduct Internet wiretaps without court orders
in some circumstances. President Bush asked Congress for the legislation
after the Sept. 11 attacks. 
The Gilmore commission's recommendations tend to carry weight in
Washington: Bush already acted on the group's advice to create an Office
of Homeland Security. Gilmore's current job as chairman of the
Republican Party and his reputation of being tech-savvy -- AOL Time
Warner's online operations are in Virginia -- add to his clout. 
Rep. Vernon Ehlers (R-Michigan) suggested additional punitive measures.
"I think hackers should also be considered terrorists and sentences that
hackers get should be in line with terrorist sentences," Ehlers said. 
Some drafts of the anti-terrorism legislation that has been wending its
way through Congress have included life prison sentences for convicted
hackers, though the latest version reserves that penalty only for
exceptional cases. 
Gilmore offered few details on the proposal to create a hacker-court. A
House press release says only that the commission will recommend the
"establishment of a special 'Cyber Court' patterned after the court
established in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act." 
The so-called FISA court is notorious among civil libertarians for being
a secret, seven-judge court that meets behind closed doors to approve
surveillance requests in "national security" cases. Proceedings are
sealed and judges do not require "probable cause" -- a legal standard
required in ordinary investigations -- before ordering eavesdropping or
surreptitious entries to plant listening devices. 
Congress created the FISA court in 1978 to oversee foreign intelligence
investigations that were too sensitive to take through the normal
process. The FISA judges review the Justice Department's requests and,
with the exception of one or two cases, have always approved them. 
Because the FISA court meets in secret, and its orders are sealed,
subjects are often unaware they're under surveillance. 
Gilmore also called for an "unprecedented partnership between the public
and private sectors" in sharing intelligence and real-time information.
In a nod to privacy, he recommended that Congress create a
not-for-profit entity to oversee the process. 
Chairman Sherwood Boehlert (R-New York) seemed to agree, saying, "market
forces have given most in private industry little incentive to invest in
computer security even as their reliance on the Internet grows." 
Gilmore went a step further, saying it was necessary to have "an entity
to develop and implement" plans to improve network security. 
Boehlert said the committee is beginning to draft legislation on this
topic. He didn't offer any dates, but said he'd take into account the
Gilmore commission's recommendations. 
Ben Polen contributed to this report.

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST